Testing
Boot camp
As teachers in Texas, regardless of our
personal beliefs about testing or our determination to focus on authentic
literacy development within our classrooms, the STAAR test is something we must
approach each year head-on. Over the past few weeks, I was able to take part in
the “Testing Boot camp” unit at Ojeda Middle School, and I appreciated my time
immensely. The unit itself focused most specifically on testing strategies, and
really sought to build students testing confidence in the few weeks leading up
to the STAAR. This allows the class to develop their testing strategies more
explicitly for a few weeks, but does not high-jack the entire year’s curriculum
by any means and the true focus of the year long unit remains focused on the
authentic literacy development for all students through the work shop setting.
I think I will incorporate a lot of these ideas in my own classroom, as I think
it is unfair for teachers to direct the entire year towards the test, but I
also think it is unfair to avoid talking about testing all together (as testing
is, unfortunately, a key avenue for school and social access).
I
will say, as you will see in my video today, I find “testing” conferences to be
much more difficult than “writing” or “reading” conferences. The main
difference, I believe, is that in a testing conference there is a much higher
value placed on the final answer. That, I suppose, is the nature of the beast that is testing. There is a
premium set on finding the “correct” answer, as the answer will ultimately be
the sole judge of success on the official test, so during a conference it is a
much more delicate process trying to help a student without giving them the
answer (because you cant give them the answer on the test!). I think this dynamic makes the research
stage much more important in a testing conference, as it is critical to
understand the root of the problem the student is facing, not just the problem
itself. Why is a student asking for help on this portion of the test? Is
reading comprehension the problem? Does the student understand the question? Is
the solution as simple as using a testing strategy more effectively? Or is this
a deeper-rooted issue? I think all of these questions are extremely important
to face at the beginning of the conference, so that both the teacher and the
student are on the same page. Again, I find the research phase of these
conferences to be more difficult (or nuanced, at least) than in a writing
conference, so I look forward to developing my ability to recognize testing
issues and address them more directly in one on one (or group) conferences.
With
that in mind, I am very interested to hear what people think of my testing
conference from my lesson video today, as it was one of the more difficult
conferences I have experienced and there is certainly tons of room for growth. What
does everyone else think about testing conferences and testing “prep” in
general?
No comments:
Post a Comment